Bribery in the NFL
As a general rule, I try to stay out of politics in sports.
They are nothing more than minefields for the unaware.
But something the National Football League is now strongly
considering has caused me to temporarily break that rule. Hopefully, I will not
regret it.
The hiring of minorities – or lack of same – for important high-ranking
positions in the league has been a sensitive subject for many years.
The Rooney Rule, adopted by the league in 2003, requires every team with a head coaching, general manager or other front-office vacancy to interview at least one minority in order to increase diversity at those levels.
The Rooney Rule, adopted by the league in 2003, requires every team with a head coaching, general manager or other front-office vacancy to interview at least one minority in order to increase diversity at those levels.
It has been spectacularly unsuccessful. Currently, there are
only four head coaches (Anthony Lynn of the Los Angels Chargers, Miami’s Brian
Flores, Mike Tomlin in Pittsburgh and Washington’s Ron Rivera) and two general managers
of color (Andrew Berry with the Browns and Chris Grier in Miami).
And now the league is considering a plan to further give
league ownership even more reason to seriously consider hiring a minority at
high-profile levels. It arrives in the form of an enhancement to accomplish
the goal of increasing diversity.
The plan – it is being called a modification of the Rooney
Rule – would use football currency as an incentive. In other words, draft
picks. If passed by the owners, it would work this way:
Hire a minority head coach and your team automatically moves
up six slots from your regular slot in the third round of the lottery the
following year, Hire a minority general manager and your team moves up 10
slots. Hire both and you hit the jackpot: 16 slots.
Other incentives: If a minority quarterbacks coach is hired,
the reward is a fourth-round compensatory pick; if the minority GM and/or coach
lasts at least three years, a fourth-round choice gains five slots.
Proponents of the plan call it incentivizing. I call it bribery
with the league desperate enough to use it as an incentive to get things
moving. The proposed move elicits
an interesting question: What is more important to an owner, moving up in the
draft or hiring the right man?
It is embarrassing to the league and the potential minority
head coach and general manager candidates that the plan resorts to using
draft capital as a bribe to encourage teams to hire them.
Well the original plan is not working, argue those seeking
an equitable solution. That’s where the desperation part enters the picture
with the draft.
In an effort to make it a little more difficult for teams to
adhere to the Rooney Rule, it is being reported teams now will be required to
interview at least two minority candidates for head coach and at least one for
a coordinator position.
It is entirely possible the Rooney Rule might never work as
it was meant to. And that is unfortunate because there are a large number of candidates
for high-ranking positions out there more than qualified to move up.
If the owners accept the plan, it is entirely possible the
number of minority hires will increase. It is also entirely possible minority
coaches hired because of the draft incentives will face unwarranted pressure to
succeed.
Is there a solution that will make all sides happy? That’s a
question that might never be answered.
Glad you said something. Next step, quotas.
ReplyDelete