Sunday, December 5, 2010

Winning this ugly is really ugly

Luck, it has been said, is the residue of hard work.

In the Browns' 13-10 victory in Miami Sunday, however, hard work had absolutely nothing to do with it. This was was pure luck from start to finish.

In a game neither team tried very hard to win, the luck dial bent just slightly enough in the Browns' direction to allow Phil Dawson to put an end to 59 minutes and 59 seconds of miserable football. If, however, you believe the Browns and Dolphins did try hard, then ugly is not a strong enough adjective to describe what unfolded in that time span.

This one went so far beyond ugly, the National Football League should hide its head in embarrassment. It's a wonder Dolphins fans didn't demand their money back for false advertising. It was not your classic defensive battle considering the final score.

Quick timeout to allow the statistics to paint the grim picture. Each team had 13 possessions, not including a Browns kneeldown at the end of the first half. In nine of those series, the Browns ran more than five plays just four times. The Dolphins were worse with 10 of their series consuming five or fewer plays.

The teams combined for a pathetic six third-down conversions in 28 attempts, just 29 first downs and only 533 yards of total offense. And the weather was beautiful. More beautiful than the football played under it.

Considering what transpired a large majority of the afternoon, one can only wonder in amazement what possessed these juggernauts to suddenly treat the crowd with back-to-back, where-did-those-come-from touchdown drives in a dizzying span of 9:29. It took the Browns just three minutes and 40 seconds to cover 94 yards in six plays to take a late third-quarter lead, but the Dolphins struck right back with an 11-play, 80-yard march to tie it.

And that, for all practical purposes, was it for the afternoon when each team owned the ball. Just as suddenly, the offense ground to a halt. Nearly one-third of the day's offense was consumed on those two drives. Dolphins fans needed No-Doz as they watched their team fall for the fifth time in six games at home this season.

Both teams played a relatively conservative game, a sort of play-not-lose philosophy which uglied up the game. Rarely did either club attempt to strike downfield. Most of the running game took place between the tackles. It was conservative football at its worst.

Miami quarterback Chad Henne tried mightily to hand this one to the Browns with three interceptions, the first two winding up as three points on the scoreboard. He finally succeeded with the third when linebacker David Bowens luckily got enough of his big paw to deflect a pass into the hands of nickelback Mike Adams to set up Dawson's game-winner.

Why the Dolphins were throwing from deep in their territory on third down with a minute left and just one timeout in a tie game is a head scratcher. Maybe Dolphins coach Tony Sparano couldn't stand another 15 minutes of this kind of football.

A moment earlier, the Dolphins had a chance to put the game away when rookie cornerback Nolan Carroll jumped the route of Cleveland tight end Ben Watson, but dropped a sure pick six of a Jake Delhomme pass that hit him squarely in the hands around the Cleveland 35. That's a whole different kind of luck. The residue of hard work? Hardly. The residue of bad football perhaps.

The offenses in this one were truly and most sincerely offensive. It was a textbook display of how not to play offensive football.

Maybe that's why Browns coach Eric Mangini had so much faith in his offense, he ordered three straight kneeldowns by Delhomme from the Miami 3 before Dawson was summoned. If that doesn't cry "I don't trust you guys anymore" then nothing will.

It was a huge and most unorthodox gamble by Mangini, who risked a bad snap, a bad hold or even a shank by Dawson. Come to think of it, that would have been a more fitting ending to regulation considering what preceded it.

As it turned out, holder Reggie Hodges had to snatch a rare high snap by Ryan Pontbriand and gave Dawson a perfect spot for the game-winner.

That's two straight victories for the Browns now and both fall into the luck category. A blown last-second field goal by Carolina's John Kasay last Sunday and now this. Two ugly victories, but they all count. At least this one didn't seem like a loss.

Maybe it's a sign of things to come.

9 comments:

  1. your a jackass,,,they play good competitive games against two good teams (the Jets and Jacksonville) and all you writers find the negativity and saw it doesn't matter if they played good or not,,, winning is the olny measuring stick. Now after a win, you focus again on the negativity and winning is no longer the only important criteria,,,, go crawl in a hole somewhere or better yet cheer for pukesburgh

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice talk. And try using the language a little better. Name calling doesn't work with me.

    Now take a nice realistic look at that game today and tell me what you saw was good football. The Browns were damn lucky they didn't lose that game. A pick six and you're talking a whole different tune. Lucky, I'm telling you. Lucky. Just like last week when they were lucky to win.

    You can't admit because you're wearing blinders.

    ReplyDelete
  3. With the offense being so stagnant with Delhomme at QB why hasn't Mangini switched to Wallace until McCoy is healthy again? Why is it so hard for the Browns to make in-game adjustments? Yes they've been lucky two weeks in a row but the defense has played fairly well lately.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Absolutely no credit to the Browns defense for playing a very good game? Shocking from you Rich...

    And it was absolutely not a "huge and most unorthodox gamble" to kill the clock and trust one of the most accurate field goal kickers in the history of professional football to hit a glorified extrapoint to win the game. Especially considering Hillis had almost fumbled twice in the game already. Hell, even if the Browns score, the Dolphins get the ball back with 50 seconds and a timeout. If you think that was the wrong call, you are even more clueless than I thought.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I would say there are two pieces of luck here: One, injuries to Channing Crowder and Brandon Marshall. Two, that Delhomme's awful pass wasn't caught by the Miami CB for a touchdown. I won't even try to defend Delhomme's decision-making.

    I don't see a lot of luck elsewhere. Are we 'lucky' Dan Carpenter made a 60 yard field goal? Are we 'lucky' Shaun Rogers is a monster who does occasionally block or deflect kicks? Is making a percentages play on Dawson to seal the win 'lucky'? I don't think so. You can say it was an ugly offensive game, which it mostly was, but there are a lot of ugly games in the NFL, and luck isn't the reason someone eventually wins them. Somebody cracks, somebody doesn't. Jake cracked at one point, Dawson at another; other than that, we did well to keep fighting and stay in the game.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Eh, I don't know, I kinda wanted to see them "go for the kill" on that one, too. Good call to kill the clock? Hellz yeah, but some signs of life out of the O would've at least made me feel a little better about that game...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anon, read with interest the following: "And it was absolutely not a "huge and most unorthodox gamble" to kill the clock and trust one of the most accurate field goal kickers in the history of professional football to hit a glorified extrapoint to win the game. Especially considering Hillis had almost fumbled twice in the game already. Hell, even if the Browns score, the Dolphins get the ball back with 50 seconds and a timeout. If you think that was the wrong call, you are even more clueless than I thought."

    Thoughts: An almost fumble is not a fumble. You cannot assume he will fumble in that situation any more than you can assume Pontbriand will blow the snap, Hodges will fail to make the hold or Dawson will miss the kick. The decision to play it safe also showed a distrust in the defense.

    Handling that situation the way Mangini did was passive football. I like coaches who are aggressive. Sure, it won the game and that's a powerful argument for that side of the debate. But I still wanna see a coach whose approach is much more aggressive.

    Let's continue to disagree on that matter.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Michael: I never mentioned that they didn't fight. All I said is that it was an ugly, ugly game (on which we agree) and that they were lucky to win (Jake Delhomme's awful pass that should have turned into a Miami TD.) That kind of luck was bad for Miami and good for the Browns. All I did was point that out.

    I'm the kind of guy who sees the glass as half empty. Sometimes, I see positive aspects in a loss. Other times, I see blemishes in victories. If I had been writing about the Dolphins instead of the Browns, they would have been skewed just as badly.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Make that skewered.

    ReplyDelete