NFL owners on the spot
The National Football League is headed toward the precipice
of a civil war, of sorts, as it methodically reopens for business in the wake
of a global pandemic.
In the midst of that exercise, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell
stunningly reversed course with regard to his league’s stance on race relations
in this country in the aftermath of the death of George Floyd at the hands of
Minneapolis policemen.
In what amounts to a watershed statement and moment, Goodell
without warning told the nation, “We, the National Football League condemn
racism and the systemic oppression of black people.
“We, the National Football League, admit we were wrong for
not listening to NFL players earlier and encourage all to speak out and
peacefully protest. We, the National Football League, believe Black Lives Matter.
“We are listening, I am listening and I will be reaching out
to players who have raised their voices and others on how we can improve and go
forward for a better and more united NFL family.”
Turning a blind eye after all these years stopped just . . .
like . . . that.
The jackpot question is whether Goodell’s message also reflects
the feelings of the owners, those 32 billionaires who are his bosses. Right now,
we don’t know what they think or where they stand. At least not publicly. And
that’s where the civil war aspect lies.
Will there be a division among the owners? A division
between owners and players?
Strongly attached to Goodell’s frank admission is a move
initially exercised by San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick in 2017
when he kneeled during the national anthem before a regular-season game.
Interpreted as a slight against the American flag and the
military, Kaepernick insisted it was not a slight, but a silent protest to the socially
perceived mistreatment by law enforcement against African Americans.
That was the only way he believed he could bring attention
to the matter. It became a cause célèbre
when the president of the United States weighed in and took it as an insult.
It resulted in the president all but demanding the kneeling must
stop and caused NFL owners to scramble in search of an equitable solution.
During that season, the subject became a daily staple on not only sports talk
radio, but cable television political programs.
The president admitted being emboldened by his stance on the
subject to Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones, who detailed a conversation he had
with the him regarding the matter in a 2018 deposition.
Said the president, “This is a very winning, strong issue
with me. Tell everybody you can’t win this one. This one lifts me.”
Television ratings for games suffered as a result as fans
zealously argued. The brouhaha eventually simmered down the next couple of seasons
with just a handful of players continuing to kneel as owners basically set the
tone on an individual team basis
That brings us back to the now part of this drama. Will the
owners deal with the situation differently than they did a few years ago? Bear
in mind a significant number of influential owners contributed greatly to the
president’s successful election in 2016.
How will they handle the situation now? How much of 2017
will be dragged back into the spotlight? Questions seeking answers with the
2020 season rapidly bearing down.
The owners must see the landscape changing rapidly with
highly visible and extremely influential athletes in the three major professional
sports joining in on the cause. The groundswell has ballooned to well over
1,000 voices.
Those voices are being heard. Among them is Browns
quarterback Baker Mayfield. His response to a recent Instagram plea by a fan to
“please tell Browns fans you’re not going to be kneeling this season” was
terse: “Pull you head out. I absolutely am (going to kneel). I’ve always spoken
my mind. And that’s from the heart.”
Wonder what Jimmy Haslam III is thinking about the face of
his franchise saying that. Wonder what stance the Browns owner and his wife
take when the media finally asks him that very question.
And just how will Browns Nation react? The answer to that
probably won’t be gleaned until after the Haslams share their thoughts publicly.
Another important voice sides with Mayfield, as well as the myriad
others who have remained silent for now. “If you still think it’s about disrespecting
the flag or our military,” said Houston Texans star defensive end J. J. Watt, “you
really haven’t been listening.”
Goodell works for the owners. Not the players; not the
paying public. The owners. That’s why his historic pronouncement was so
incredulously stunning.
One would think all his moves are
made with full knowledge of the owners. Logical thinking then suggests they are
in accord with this. But logic sometimes tends to swerve in unexpected
directions.
It is entirely possible the president might not be a factor
this time. He is currently in the middle of a reelection campaign. The NFL
situation has obliquely caught his attention, but he has other more important
concerns about which to be worried.
After learning the U. S. Soccer Board of Directors will now
allow its players to kneel during the national anthem if they desire, he
tweeted: “And it looks like the NFL is heading in that direction also, but not
with me watching!”
The owners are on their own this time. Their commissioner has spoken. It’s time they did, too.
The owners are on their own this time. Their commissioner has spoken. It’s time they did, too.
Perception is everything! They can its not disrespectful all they want, but that's not how its perceived by the majority of the viewing public. Instead of inciting division among the public, why not find a more effective way of protesting? Baker hasn't even established himself as a good quarterback, let alone influencing public opinion.
ReplyDeleteAnd how do you know a majority of the viewing public perceives it this way? Do you have any facts to back up that claim? I follow politics closely and don't remember seeing anything like that.
ReplyDeleteNow that the league has come around with regard to the situation, watch more players kneel this year. It will not be the flashpoint it was four years ago. Why not? Because more people now see and understand.
Mayfield might not have established himself as a good quarterback, but he has established himself as a well-regarded spokesman for the cause.
As for a more effective way of protesting, any ideas? Seems to me this is the most effective way since it brings the cause out into the open.
It might cost the NFL some customers at first -- those fans who misperceive the players' intent -- but the league obviously believes it's worth the gamble. It will ultimately emerge he winner.
From "Rolling Stone" "The factoid that 72% of Americans are against the kneeling, sitting form or protest – which has been creeping up in coverage – is, in fact, from a September 2016 Reuters poll in which 72% of responders said they found it to be “unpatriotic” while 61% disagreed with the protest itself. Meanwhile, a SurveyMonkey poll from the same time reported that 44% didn’t support Kaepernick’s protest compared to 29% who did and 27% who were unsure." Sports used to be a diversion, a chance to get away from life's problems for a couple hours. It has become nothing more than a political show. There are ways to protest and become an activist without injecting it into the game itself.
DeleteThat was four years ago, Bill. Welcome to 2020. Times have changed. Check it out:
ReplyDeletehttps://sports.yahoo.com/poll-majority-of-americans-now-support-nfl-players-right-to-protest-151212603.html
And those numbers will increase.
When a large number of NFL players -- roughly 70% of the players in the league are black -- kneel this season, will you be among those who refuse to watch games?
I won't.