Three is always better than two
What’s better for a National Football League team than
having one good running back? Two? Three?
Well after the first big round off free-agent signings, the
Browns added to their infantry approach on offense by signing ex-Ohio State
star Carlos Hyde, who will pair with the extremely versatile Duke Johnson Jr.
in the backfield.
Good move. He more than replaces Isaiah Crowell, whose
inconsistency marginalized him in the eyes of the new front office and off he
went to the New York Jets.
But the depth in the Cleveland ground game does not need to
end there. Hyde and Johnson together are nice, but they would be even better,
more effective, with the addition of one of the strong running backs in this
year’s draft class.
At the top of that position class, of course, is Saquon
Barkley, who is also at the top of the entire draft class and a possible
selection for the Browns ay No. 1. Possible, not probable.
General Manager John Dorsey was asked whether Hyde’s signing
precluded any thoughts of passing on Barkley when NFL Commissioner Roger
Goodell puts the Browns on the clock six weeks from now in Arlington, Texas.
“Not necessarily,” Dorsey coyly told the Cleveland media the
other day. “You can’t have enough good football players.” That right there
should stop fans of this team in their tracks.
Was that a yes or a no? Seems as though Dorsey is playing
mind games with the rest of the NFL in true cloak-and-dagger fashion at this
time of the year. Sort of a keep-them-guessing game.
He then furthered his remarks with this tease: “Saquon would
be a nice addition to the team,” he said, “another guy who can go out and make
big plays. Use all the weapons you can. If he comes here, the more the better.
He’d definitely be a great addition.”
Would be? If he comes, not when? A classic case of mixed
signals. The man sure knows how to confuse.
And while it’s still way too early to make a definite
commitment at the top, it almost sounds as though Barkley’s name will be the first
of Goodell calls. Almost. Can’t be positively certain yet,
But if it’s Dorsey’s intention to completely resurrect the
Browns’ offense, he needs to follow through on one of his answers to the media
when he told them, “You can’t have enough good football players.”
The possibility of having Hyde, Johnson and Barkley in the
same backfield in some way, shape or form seems to be what he is implying. He
should listen to himself.
* * *
So who is going to replace the retired Joe Thomas at left
offensive tackle for the Browns this season? Shon Coleman? Spencer Drango? Rod
Johnson? Newcomer Donald Stephenson? Is that man not yet on the roster?
The draft class at that position is not strong this season.
So unless Dorsey gets lucky and finds a gold nugget as he pans for that
position deep in the lottery, it looks as though one of the aforementioned will
be the man.
Coleman, who played right tackle for the Browns last season,
most likely will get the first crack. He is no stranger to the position, having
played it during his final two years at Auburn.
He is free to move to left tackle after the Browns signed Chris
Hubbard as a free agent earlier this week. Hubbard filled in at right tackle and
played well last season for Pittsburgh when Marcus Gilbert encountered hamstring
problems.
Dorsey pointed out during his news conference that he saw
Thomas working with Coleman in the Berea facility, obviously trying to pass
along some of the nuances of the position that enabled him to carve out a Hall
of Fame career.
Drango, who replaced Thomas when he went down with a torn triceps
muscle in week seven of the winless 2017 campaign, had his problems in the
second half of the season, most notably in pass protection.
Stephenson has made 37 NFL starts in six seasons, mostly at right
tackle. Johnson, a fifth-round draft pick by Cleveland last season, suffered a
sprain MCL in early September last year and landed on injured reserve.
According to reports, Thomas has been in the building working with Coleman, so that may be the direction they're going.
ReplyDeleteMentioned that, Bill. third graf from the end.
DeleteWhat is the Team's strategy? Control clock? Control field position? Not get behind more than 1 score? Limit turnovers? Score 20-23 points avg? I'll probably watch and follow them either way, win or lose, but this would be more enjoyable...
ReplyDeleteBall control. Keep the chains moving. Avoid turnovers. Create turnovers. Shorten the field. Play smart football.
DeleteI Like The Thought Of A Strong Running Game That Controls The Clock And Keeps Our Defense Off Of The Field. A Strong Running Game That Keeps Our Offensive Line In Attack Mode. It Also Reduces The Possibility Of Losing Our Quarterback(s) To Injury.
ReplyDeleteIts also a necessity in the AFC North in December.
Delete