Options galore for Haslam
It’s called Black Monday, the day on the National Football
League calendar when heads roll, jobs are lost, reputations are tainted.
It’s not actually on the official NFL calendar, but it might
as well be because it takes place every year on the day following the
conclusion of the league’s regular season. And it won’t be any different this
season.
That day this season is next Monday, Jan. 4. That’s when several
coaches, some general managers and a slew of coordinators will need to haul out
the résumé, update it and seek employment elsewhere because there will be an ex
in front of their current title.
The carousel began spinning almost a week early when the
Philadelphia Eagles stunningly fired head coach Chip Kelly Tuesday along with a high-ranking
member of the front office in the personnel department.
Among others in jeopardy, if the rumors are to be believed,
are Browns General Manager Ray Farmer and head coach Mike Pettine. And why not
after what will most likely be a 3-13 season following Sunday’s loss to
Pittsburgh?
Even though Browns owner Jimmy Haslam III said last summer
he would “not blow things up,” the belief is he is leaning heavily in that
direction for the third time since becoming owner. He has three options -- and, suddenly, now a fourth -- to
weigh before Jan. 4 arrives.
He can decide to keep just one of his top football people;
blow it up entirely and fire Farmer and Pettine; surprise everyone and keep
both men; and then there's Kelly. More on him later.
The worst mistake Haslam can make is keeping one man. Right now, that one man probably would be Pettine, who
surprisingly has received endorsements for his retention from several highly
respected veterans on the team.
If only one man is retained, it should be Farmer. Do not
interpret this as an endorsement of the GM because he certainly has not come
even close to improving the roster from a talent standpoint.
It is only because he should be allowed to pick the next
coach. That’s a move most owners delegate to the general manager. Pettine was not Farmer’s choice, although he was with the organization at the time as
assistant GM.
Keeping Pettine and releasing Farmer would be worse because
the incoming new general manager should be allowed to choose his own coach. By
making that move, Haslam would be repeating the same mistake. As the saying
goes, those who choose to ignore mistakes of the past are doomed to repeat them.
The only sensible move, even though it would be going
against his summer declaration, is a general housecleaning. Get rid of them
both because all they have done is perpetuate a losing culture that has lasted
far too long.
If, however, Haslam stuns everyone and keeps both men, he is
sanctioning what they have accomplished. Those accomplishments include a
talent-poor roster (Farmer) and only 10 victories in 32 games (Pettine).
If the owner, whose prime goal is to return the Browns to
NFL respectability, chooses to
keep that kind of production around, he has more patience than Job. By doing
that, he risks alienating a fan base that is already beginning to crumble.
But now, there is a fourth option for Haslam. Kelly’s
dismissal in Philadelphia very well could ramp up the rumor mill again with a
possible destination of Cleveland in the future. Kelly and the Browns were
linked nearly three years ago.
It was initially reported by various outlets in January 2013
that Kelly was on the verge of becoming the Browns’ new coach, succeeding Pat
Shurmur. Negotiating for the club were Haslam and then-CEO Joe Banner.
Kelly, also courted by the Buffalo Bills and Eagles at the
time, eventually decided to remain at the University of Oregon. A week later, he changed
his mind and signed with the Eagles, with whom he recorded a pair of 10-6
seasons before slipping to 6-9 this season.
One of the main reasons Kelly was let go was his insistence
on controlling player personnel in addition to coaching. It’s more than a coincidence
his coaching record suffered after gaining control of that department.
Kelly’s availability certainly could complicate matters for
Haslam, who eventually settled on Rob Chudzinski shortly after Kelly changed
his mind and went back to Oregon. Chudzinski racked up a 4-12 season and was
fired.
The last time something like this occurred with the Browns,
then owner Randy Lerner couldn’t act fast enough after learning the New York
Jets fired Eric Mangini on Black Monday following the 2008 season, Romeo
Crennel’s last with the Browns.
Nine days later, Mangini was named Browns coach and guided
the team to a pair of 5-11 seasons before he was canned and succeeded by
Shurmur.
Will history repeat itself at 76 Lou Groza Blvd.? Stay
tuned. Black Monday is right around the corner.
"Randy Levine"???
ReplyDeleteYep. But the Randy Levine I knew didn't own the Browns. Good catch. That, of course, should be Randy Lerner. Fixed. Much tnx from an embarrassed blogger.
DeleteHappy New Year, brownie, and tnx for keeping me straight, at least when it comes to remembering owners' names.
Rich, what would you think of them hiring Kelly?
ReplyDeleteDW
I would be very much against it. He is a college coach seeking to change the way the NFL has played football for the last 75 years. It's not going to happen. Hopefully, Haslam sees that and moves on.
DeleteThere has always been one bright spot in the misery of the past 17 years. We have always been able to look forward to an interesting off season. Think how boring it would be to be winning all the time and have nothing to look forward to until next August!!!
DeleteIf looking forward to an interesting offseason is a bright spot, that tells you all you need to know about how moribund the last 17 years have been.
ReplyDeleteFrankly, I'd much rather be among those who bathe in the success of this team on an annual basis and look forward to how the front office can sustain that success. To me, that wouldn't be boring at all.
Again, we disagree right up until the last day of the year. How refreshing is that?
HNY, southie. Looking forward to 2016 and more battles with ya.
Please, don't let Chip Kelly be an actual option, Jimmy. Please, don't entertain that thought. I beg.
ReplyDeleteNot certain, Strummer, but I wouldn't be surprised if you had a lot of company there. Besides, it's beneath you to beg.
ReplyDelete