Monday leftovers (Friday edition)
Might as well get it out into the open right now. Buckle up
for a quarterback controversy swirling somewhere in Berea. Maybe even today.
After Johnny Manziel’s moderately successful first-half
performance in Thursday night’s loss to the Bengals in Cincinnati, it’s only
natural that talk will surface regarding the immediate future of the
quarterback position for the Browns.
He was just good enough in the first 30 minutes to make some
fans actually think that maybe, just maybe, he has improved his game to the
point where he will not embarrass himself or his team.
In the next 10 days or so, until the club pays a visit to
Death Valley, er, Pittsburgh to play the Steelers, the main story will center
on who starts that game. Will it be Manziel or Josh McCown, who had to sit out
the Bengals game with painful ribs?
Mike Pettine will be pestered, probably on a daily basis,
with questions surrounding his next command decision. The answer should be
obvious, but he’ll probably stretch it out to just before game time a week from
Sunday.
Let’s be honest. The Browns are 2-7. They have lost their
last four games. They are 2-12 in their last 14 games and on a train headed
speedily toward yet another cellar finish in the AFC North. At this point, why
not start Manziel? What does the head coach have to lose? Another game? So?
What difference does it make whether the Browns wind up 2-14
or 3-13 or 4-12? It’s time to find out just what Manziel can do. Let’s see what
he’s got on a more permanent basis. Seven games remain. Barring injury, he
should start them all.
A lot of questions about him need to be answered. Now would
be the perfect opportunity to get them answered. So . . . why not start him now?
Assuming Manziel is considered the quarterback of the future
for this franchise, that future definitely is now. Not next season. No need to
waste time watching the veteran McCown struggle through another futile season.
But what about the crutch most coaches lean on that says you
play the man who gives you the best chance to win? Ordinarily that would make
sense. But this is neither an ordinary team nor an ordinary situation.
McCown is 36 years old and probably won’t be with the team
next season. He has been a solid addition from a morale and toughness standpoint.
The beating he has endured the last five games would put most quarterbacks out
of commission for the season. Time to give him the rest of the season off.
According to his coach and some of his teammates, Manziel is
not the same deer-in-the-headlights rookie from last season. He has matured to
the point where he actually looks like a National Football League quarterback.
On several throws against the Bengals when he did not stray
from the pocket, he displayed the perfect throwing rhythm of an NFL
quarterback. His best throw, off a play fake, doinked off the left knee of wide
receiver Taylor Gabriel in the third quarter. It could not have been executed
any better.
It’s not as though Manziel can’t do it. And the more he plays,
the more comfortable he will feel. Pettine owes him at least that much as a
reward for his hard work.
To haul him back to the bench if McCown is ready to go for
Pittsburgh would be a mistake. To be deliberately repetitious, McCown is not
the future of this team and continuing to play him will retard whatever growth
pattern Manziel has established.
But what, say the critics, about how awful Manziel looked in
the second half of the Bengals game? Good point until you take into
consideration his offensive coordinator did not give him anything resembling a
ground game to offset any pressure from the Bengals. Only one rushing attempt
in the second half.
Throwing three- and four-receiver packages at the Cincinnati
defense on every play sent a blaring message: We’re going to throw the
football. And it was party time for the Bengals’ front seven.
The fact Manziel was sacked only three times down the
stretch is somewhat remarkable. Under similar circumstances, McCown would have
been battered even more.
If nothing else, Manziel’s ability to extend plays weighs
much more heavily in his favor. At least he gives himself a solid chance to
complete a play when it breaks down. And with the very ordinary Cleveland
offensive line protecting him, that happens more often than not.
So what to do? In defense of Pettine, all he wants to do is
win games. His job depends on it. Staying with Manziel would be considered by
some to be a gamble. But the bottom line shows each quarterback has produced a
victory this season.
Maybe he should flip a coin.
* * *
When Pettine suggested during his halftime chat with Tracy
Wolfson that Manziel should “calm down a little bit” in the second half so he could
be more productive, I yelled at the television screen, “No, don’t calm him
down. He’s at his best when he operates in a reckless manner.”
He seems to play much better when he freelances after being
flushed from the pocket. His unpredictability makes it more difficult on
opposing defenses.
Yes, it’s highly unorthodox. But it sure worked for smallish
quarterbacks like Fran Tarkenton and Russell Wilson. Besides, it’s much more
fun watching Manziel work his magical escapes out of trouble. And he is smart enough
to know when to throw the ball away, which he did several times against the
Bengals.
If Pettine starts Manziel in Pittsburgh, it behooves
offensive coordinator John DeFilippo to be more creative in his play selection,
knowing how mobile his quarterback can be. He’s not a standing target like
McCown. The threat of rollouts in either direction, sometimes as misdirection, can
keep a defense honest.
* * *
What in the world is wrong with Andy Lee? The usually
reliable punter had two poor boots against the Bengals that gave them great
field position they translated into 10 points.
Lee, who has been forced to punt the ball 29 times in the
last five games, as opposed to just 16 times in the first four games, shanked
his first punt of the game only 34 yards. It set up the Bengals at their 37
from where they scored the game’s first touchdown 10 plays layer.
Then a 28-yarder didn’t even make it to midfield (Cleveland’s
49-yard line) after the Browns’ first possession of the second half. Nate
Orchard’s sack of Andy Dalton on a third-and-2 at the Browns’ 5 saved a
touchdown. A Mike Nugent field goal stretched the Bengals’ lead to 17-10.
Maybe we’ve come to expect too much from the Pro Bowl
punter. His four other punts in the game averaged 53 yards.
* * *
Nice to see Dwayne Bowe contribute to the cause. With
wideouts Andrew Hawkins and Brian Hartline sidelined with injuries, Bowe
stepped up with three catches for 31 yards. He made his first reception of the
season, a four-yard slant, with 2:02 left in the first quarter.
Then in the final minutes after Marlon Moore blocked a punt
with 3:28 left in regulation, Bowe stepped up again with catches of 16 and 11
yards, accounting for the only positive yardage on a drive that died at the
Cincinnati 12. Welcome to the offense, No. 80.
* * *
Notebook: When
Bengals wide receiver Mohamed Sanu scored easily on a 25-yard reverse early in the
fourth quarter to climax an eight-play, 91-yard drive, there wasn’t a
Brown within 10 yards of him down the left sideline. It was so clean, Dalton
couldn’t find anyone to block along the way. . . . It looks as though tight end
Gary Barnidge does not hold the same favored status with Manziel as he does with
McCown. He caught only two passes in seven targets. . . . Duke Johnson Jr.
touched the ball only five times, scoring the Browns’ only touchdown on a 12-yard pass from Manziel after running a circle route. He carried the ball
just three times for zero yards. . . . The Cleveland run defense returned to normal,
surrendering 152 yards that included a couple of knees taken by backup
quarterback A. J. McCarron at the end of the game. . . . The Browns recorded 13
first downs, two in the second half, and totaled 213 yards. They owned the ball
for just 24 minutes in the turnover-free game. That’s 29 first downs, 49½
minutes (out of 120) in time of possession and 467 total yards in the last two
games.
How much more embarrassment do you think Haslam can stand?
ReplyDeleteWe'll find out soon enough. The man has a breaking point. We just don't know when or where that will be. When it happens, though, it should be very entertaining.
ReplyDelete