Speed it up, guys
Something for Mike Pettine and Kyle Shanahan to ponder . . .
It’s time for the Browns to head back to the kind of offense
that proved so successful in four of the first six games of the season. Time to
go up-tempo and dial up more no huddle.
There was a very good reason the Browns scored a pathetic
six points against one of the worst defenses in the National Football League
last Sunday in Jacksonville. They all but abandoned the no-huddle approach to
football.
Stop and think. What helped erase a 27-3 halftime lead by
the Pittsburgh Steelers in the season opener and tied the game with about five
minutes left? That’s right, the no huddle.
OK, they lost that game. But they wouldn’t have been in it
had it not been for the success of the no huddle. They actually had the
Steelers breathless and running scared until the end.
And look what happened in the game against Tennessee. The
Titans ran out to a 28-3 lead with about two minutes left in the first half of
that one. The Browns were all but buried until they remembered . . . wait for
it . . . the no huddle.
Didn’t take long to overcome that large deficit and finally
take the lead with a few minutes left. Without the up-tempo game, they were
looking at an embarrassing loss.
So why in the world would they all but forsake that offense
that helped them win one game and scare the daylights out of another team in
another? What in the world were the coaches thinking?
What possible excuse could they use to explain away that
serious misuse of an offense that has produced mostly positive results? There
are none. All they have to do is look at the numbers.
They used the no huddle only 13 times in the Jacksonville
loss, a paltry four in the first half. And they did not use it with any
consistency.
The beauty of the no huddle is to prevent the opposition
from substituting and slowly wear them down. It also allows the quarterback, in
this case Brian Hoyer, to pretty much run his own offense.
Shanahan can try and send in plays, but Hoyer is too busy in
this case calling out the protections, making certain all skill players are
lined up correctly and having enough time to read the defense.
The Jaguars were playing just badly enough on offense to
keep the Browns in the game. It was their defense that needed to be slowed down
and ultimately worn down and the no huddle is the perfect way to accomplish
that.
So what if the Browns had two positions changes on the
offensive line? It worked in the first half of the Titans game when John Greco
moved over to play center when Alex Mack went down and Paul McQuistan replaced
him at right guard.
The new setup along the line didn’t hinder the historic
comeback against the Titans. And yet, that scheme was eschewed in Jacksonville probably
because the offensive thinking was the Jags’ defense would buckle. Instead, it
got stronger.
In the Steelers’ loss, the Browns, no doubt believing they
had nothing to lose, went up-tempo in the second half after putting just a
Billy Cundiff field goal on the board in the first 30 minutes.
Running 21 of their 31 plays no huddle on the first four
series of the second half, they erased the Pittsburgh halftime lead with three
touchdowns and a field goal before putting together a seven-play, 54-yard drive
(six no huddle) that ended with a
punt.
Against Tennessee, Shanahan called for 19 no-huddle plays of
the 68 the Browns ran. Four series without a no huddle produced a punt, field
goal, interception and touchdown. The five possessions with at least one
no-huddle play produced a field goal, touchdown, ball turned over on downs and touchdown.
In case you’re wondering how the no-huddle factored into the
other three games . . .
In the victory over New Orleans, the Browns ran 19 of their
72 plays up-tempo, 16 in the second half. In the loss to Baltimore, they ran
only four of their 55 plays without a huddle, just one in the second half. And
in the Pittsburgh victory, nine of their 56 plays were no huddle, three in the
second half. That’s because they wrapped up the game with a strong first half
(21-3 lead) and coasted. The six no-huddle plays in the first half were either
directly responsible for or led to three touchdowns.
It’s quite obvious the Browns have achieved much more
success with the no-huddle approach than those plays where they huddled. There is
statistical proof they fare far better on offense when playing up-tempo
football.
They need to trust Hoyer more with that approach. With games
against winless Oakland and one-victory Tampa Bay up next, faster football on
offense should be given more consideration. A lot more.
Memo to file: Mack was injured during the Steelers game. Offensive line was unchanged during the Titan comeback.
ReplyDeleteSouthie,
ReplyDeleteI stand corrected. Good catch. I need to filter myself a little better. Appreciate it. Keeps me on my toes. They still didn't miss a beat for the rest of that game when Mack went down.
I knew you'd be back. Just can't get enough, can you?
I stand firm by my notion that this team operates better offensively when it goes uptempo. Agree or disagree.
True. The surprising thing to me was how Grecco played like he had never made a snap in his life and that guard they picked up from Seattle was worthless. Hoyer lost confidence in his protection and the backs had no blocking. The results were self-evident.
DeleteAnd yet, the offensive coaches never made any adjustments to alleviate the problems. Not to mention Pettine's awful fourth-down decisions. The coaches were just as culpable as the players.
ReplyDeleteAgree, it was a "total" team effort. In defense of the coaches(except for Pettine), I don't think they anticipated the offensive line would melt down like it did. They certainly showed no signs of it during the second half of the Steelers game. What adjustments can you make when your pass protection breaks down and you have no run blocking? Not many alternatives left.
Delete